0:00
/
0:00

❄️🔥 “Where is the national security case?” — Col. Douglas Macgregor

Why the Strategic Case for Greenland Still Doesn’t Exist — and What That Reveals About U.S. Foreign Policy

❄️🔥 “Where is the national security case for why we absolutely need to control Greenland?” — Col. Douglas Macgregor

⚠️ Macgregor (@DougAMacgregor) says the push to control Greenland rests on a “threat narrative without evidence.”

🌍 He challenges claims of Russian or Chinese “incursion, invasion, occupation,” calling the idea “a crazy notion.”

🛢️ He notes the justification keeps shifting — from oil and gas to rare earths to national security — with no clear rationale.

❓ Macgregor asks the core question: “What is the national security imperative that means Greenland has to be governed by the United States?”

🔍 A sharp breakdown of why the strategic argument simply doesn’t add up.

🎥 A must‑watch clip for anyone following U.S. Arctic policy and global strategy.

Discussion about this video

User's avatar

Ready for more?